Sorry, that's not spin. That's fact.
And the second point starts with the word 'if', as to put it in perspective as to just how many Apple products are in the hands of consumers.
Did Apple not pass Microsoft last year in market capitalization? That's fact, not spin.
Not to mince words, but the ipad is a tablet computer, no? Does it compute? Yes. Docs, spreadsheets, presentations? Yes. Surf the web, check email, ect.. Yes.
Is it a full fledged OSX machine? Of course not, but does that disqualify the ipad from being a tablet computer? Not at all. Are net books considered computers? Of course! Yet most are so much slower at performing the same tasks compared to an iPad.
Regardless of whether or not an iPad is or is not a "computer", Apple is still currently the third largest CPU manufacturer in the US.
How are any of these statements anything but raw factual data?
They're spin because they require changing or ignoring context for impact. Apple is the 3rd largest pc maker in the US, but that doesn't translate to a significant portion of the US computer market, where they're still less than 10%. Just because the market is dominated by non-US computer makers doesn't make Apple more relevant - they're a minnow, and putting them in a fish bowl rather than a lake doesn't change that.
And their CPU production is mostly for mobile devices, rather than computers.
The fact that 75% of the college market owns Macs - how much of the total market is that? Apple has 100% of the epb tablet market - shall I issue a press release? A company can't dominate the PC market selling home computers - the big money is in making machines for business, where Apple has always been marginal. Their own "Mac v. PC" ads tout this very fact - in almost every commercial, Justin Long explains that the Mac is better for fun like movies and iLife, the PC better for work like spreadsheets and databases.
And the iPad runs the exact same OS as the iPhone, so if the iPad is a computer, what is the iPhone4, which has the exact same functional capacity, more memory and more RAM? A mini-tablet?
In order to make your "if" statement work, you've got to change the context of what a computer is from the accepted definitions, the old "that depends on what your definition of is is" - which is spin.
Netbooks aren't as powerful as workstations but they're considerably more powerful and flexible than the iPad because they're capable of running a full OS.
A full computer is capable of accepting input (working with data and myriad files, accepting media input via differing sources and such) and generating output/content (printing, writing to media) - both areas where the iPad is weaker than any netbook. These functions were kept rudimentary for the sake of simplicity, and because it's designed primarily as a playback device - to show, rather than create.
Years ago, at the end of a relationship, a girl said "I thought we could still be friends." I replied "yeah, the thing is, you're not a
good friend."
You can argue the iPad is a computer, but you can't claim it's a good one.