SweetPoison said:I know and I get that.
Ditto.
SweetPoison said:I know and I get that.
saphire said:Nick have you checked out Argos online, they have a 32gb wifi.
On the main page it shows in stock, but if you click to buy and then go to your trolley, it says out of stock...
Thanks for thinking of me, though.
Sent from my iPad using iPF
It's just part of the Apple Philosophy, which is also largely responsible IMO for the market share division between iOS and it's variants and PC/Windows. Hey, I'm not meaning to be overly critical, just calling it the way I see it.Thphilli said:Exactly. Its a marketing tactic and nothing else. Some will buy into the tsunami story to ease their minds, but this is how Apple prefers to sell their mobile devices. Creates more of a buzz.
But why - as a for-profit company with shareholders to account to - would Apple choose to *deliberately* delay shipment and frustrate customers, rather than ship product and make money back as fast as they can? Having impatient, unhappy customers is just bad, stupid publicity, and it's not like they need any more publicity.
gentlefury said:Profiteering is profiting over war supplies!! The iPad is a toy...this is called supply and demand. If the scalpers buy up the supply they can charge what they want...is it fair, no, is it illegal, no. Best thing you can do is not buy em.
Wrong. Profiteering is defined as unethical business practice during times of emergency. Not just war supplies, or during war time. To use your incorrect definition, you could argue that profiteering during war time is also just supply and demand.
The laws around profiteering are designed to protect consumers from unethical business practices in times of short supply, such as increasing prices.
Sent from my iPad using iPF
gentlefury said:I doubt that profiteering applies to luxury items. No one is materially injured if they can't get an iPad.
Rather than doubt it, why not look it up?
I dont know where you got material injury from - I didnt come across that in my research of the term.
The fact is that I never claimed what the ebay scalpers are doing *is* illegal, only unethical - and drew the comparison with profiteering to demostrate the similarities (taking advantage of short supply to stockpile a product and then sell at an inflated price)
To be honest I wish I hadnt bothered, it seems you cant have an opinion without everyone else telling you why it is wrong.
It's just part of the Apple Philosophy, which is also largely responsible IMO for the market share division between iOS and it's variants and PC/Windows. Hey, I'm not meaning to be overly critical, just calling it the way I see it.
The fact is that I never claimed what the ebay scalpers are doing *is* illegal, only unethical - and drew the comparison with profiteering to demostrate the similarities (taking advantage of short supply to stockpile a product and then sell at an inflated price)
To be honest I wish I hadnt bothered, it seems you cant have an opinion without everyone else telling you why it is wrong.
Seadog said:An article on MacRumors tells of the efforts that Apple is making to be sure enough iPads are available in light of the tsunami damage. It is costing them a lot of money, and Apple is not passing the added costs on to the customers. Good for Apple.
Seadog said:An article on MacRumors tells of the efforts that Apple is making to be sure enough iPads are available in light of the tsunami damage. It is costing them a lot of money, and Apple is not passing the added costs on to the customers. Good for Apple.