Do you regret not purchasing 3G/4G
- Thread starter Granitetop
- Start date
Kenstephens
iPF Noob
In Australia the decision to go wifi only is easier because 4G doesn't work here. What caught me out was I didn't realise that no 4G meant no gps either.
As far as network access goes, outside of wifi cover tethering with my iPhone avoids another data plan and works great.
Ken
As far as network access goes, outside of wifi cover tethering with my iPhone avoids another data plan and works great.
Ken
Seadog
iPF Noob
Oklahoma is considered a backwater state, but I traveled from central to NE Oklahoma, including a bunch of long rural stretches. Other than a couple of small dead spots, I had 4G coverage the whole way. But when I got into Kansas, coverage was low quality Edge service.
My thinking:
If you spend a lot of time on the road, go 4G
If you keep your iPad at home or where there is wifi, you do not have to have 4G.
My thinking:
If you spend a lot of time on the road, go 4G
If you keep your iPad at home or where there is wifi, you do not have to have 4G.
Last edited:
pianoman
iPF Noob
Those are the exact links I consulted before posting. Okay I didn't check Verizon - theyre impressive but as far as AT&T goes the term "dozens" is completely inaccurate. Those maps prove my point. There are indeed "scores" of 4G non-LTE cities as in the dark blue with the AT&T maps but those are not true 4G speeds. AT&T is borrowing that term in a bit of false advertising. And those "4G" cities are no more than any of us have available to us on our phones right now that register "3G" on our screens.
My only point to the original poster was to not make speed of LTE your reason to purchase a new iPad with 4G. As it will be a long time before true LTE comes to 90% of iPad 3+4G users.
Last edited:
Not sure why you're arguing what's clearly shown in the coverage map and list. There are dozens of -- actually more than 200 -- 4G cities between AT&T and Verizon across the country.
The flavor of 4G that Apple is touting is what those carriers are providing. And lots of 4G customers are raving about their speeds, so they're clearly not getting the same 3G that they were on iPad 1 and 2, or you're saying they're all delusional and cooking up faster speeds.
pianoman
iPF Noob
Surely you know that what people report is anecdotal and not an indicator of the facts. Just read the new iPad screen threads and you'll see how perception can really muck up the waters. To be honest with the thread here Verizon has about 120 cities but AT&T has only about 30 cities. Many major cities are missing on AT&T's map. The other question I would have is how far does the LTE coverage actually extend out from the city limits. When AT&T rolled out 3G originally you got full 3G speeds only within the city limits but it didn't even reach out to the closest suburbs. I wonder if anyone could report on that phenomenon here. Do any of you with the Verizon or AT&T coverage on your iPad get the LTE insignia in suburbs of the cities?
Lol, do you imagine that people are paying for 4G and getting 3G and there's not already some lawyer rounding them up for a lawsuit?
From the Verizon link alone:
As of March 15, our 4G LTE network covers more than 200 million people in 203 markets across the United States. Below is a list of current 4G LTE markets. Stay tuned for updates.
Last edited:
AQ_OC
iPF Novice
pianoman said:
This entire region in upstate SC is more rural than city, yet I get LTE over the 40 miles from my house to my office. But I don't know how thoroughly covered the region is, but Verizon does show the coverage on their maps. Based on what I have seen so far, I'm inclined to believe they are accurate. But I have seen speeds range from 5-20 Mbps down and up. This is a screenshot I took yesterday morning about halftway between work and home (in the parking lot of McDonalds, where I get coffee).
Last edited:
They'd be crazy to misrepresent speeds, because speeds are easily testable.
Their competitors and others constantly do speed tests and are ready to create legal and marketing probs for them if they find anything off. Carriers also are regulated.
iluvmyipad
iPF Novice
Granitetop said:
I opted for the 4g, my first ipad was 3g. I would rather have it just incase I need it, because you can just go back and get it later.
pianoman
iPF Noob
the fact remains that AT&T only offers true 4G LTE in very few cities. The area on the AT&T maps marked in dark blue that has the key lettering 4G is just their Quasi 4G which is only a fast 3G speed. SkullOne does a nice exposing of the AT&T 4G myth over in the iPhone forum. It's worth reading. I'm picking up my Verizon iPad 3 today. Verizon, for obvious reasons.
the fact remains that AT&T only offers true 4G LTE in very few cities. The area on the AT&T maps marked in dark blue that has the key lettering 4G is just their Quasi 4G which is only a fast 3G speed. SkullOne does a nice exposing of the AT&T 4G myth over in the iPhone forum. It's worth reading. I'm picking up my Verizon iPad 3 today. Verizon, for obvious reasons.
Why so hung up on AT&T? They can mind their own business, and if they can't, the market will take care of them.
I don't champion any carrier. I just use what works best for me, where I live and travel, and I'd expect anyone with sense to do likewise.
pianoman
iPF Noob
The issue of a forum is to be informed, KayKay. Right? A post or so back you stated there were hundreds of cities covered by Verizon and AT&T. That was not an entirely accurate statement. I'm glad you taught me about Verizon. They have great LTE. But AT&T people are outta luck with LTE. That was important to point out as I did.
Similar threads
