What is the new rule about in app purchase?
Tim SPRACKLEN said:Putting the Apple case - Kindle offer their app for free. Apple get no revenue from that app, though they're hosting it on their servers. If Kindle direct users to the Amazon Store from their app, then Apple get no revenue from any purchases made at the Amazon store, through the free app that Amazon have placed in the App Store.
Paid apps contribute 30% of the purchase price to Apple. So this is clearly a loop hole. So Apple insisted that apps should not direct users to external websites where users make their purchase, thereby depriving them of their revenue.
Of course these sites objected - hey, wouldn't you. They said 'Publishing is a very competitive business, we simply cannot afford to give you 30%'.
So a compromise was reached - and I think it's pretty fair - because Apple insist they remove their 'Store buttons' but they don't charge the retailer - it's still a free app. So Apple still don't get the revenue even though they're hosting the free Kindle app. So it's slightly less convenient to the user but Apple are 'firing a shot across the bows' - they're saying, 'Thus far, and no further'.
OK - opposing views, please....(I'm not an Apple employee but enjoy playing 'Devil's advocate'....
Tim
Tim SPRACKLEN said:Putting the Apple case - Kindle offer their app for free. Apple get no revenue from that app, though they're hosting it on their servers. If Kindle direct users to the Amazon Store from their app, then Apple get no revenue from any purchases made at the Amazon store, through the free app that Amazon have placed in the App Store.
Paid apps contribute 30% of the purchase price to Apple. So this is clearly a loop hole. So Apple insisted that apps should not direct users to external websites where users make their purchase, thereby depriving them of their revenue.
Of course these sites objected - hey, wouldn't you. They said 'Publishing is a very competitive business, we simply cannot afford to give you 30%'.
So a compromise was reached - and I think it's pretty fair - because Apple insist they remove their 'Store buttons' but they don't charge the retailer - it's still a free app. So Apple still don't get the revenue even though they're hosting the free Kindle app. So it's slightly less convenient to the user but Apple are 'firing a shot across the bows' - they're saying, 'Thus far, and no further'.
OK - opposing views, please....(I'm not an Apple employee but enjoy playing 'Devil's advocate'....
Tim
That makes sense to me......except the Amazon Windowshop app is still unaffected, you would think they would insist this is the case on all such apps? Unless it's just ebooks and maybe not enough revenue from iBooks?
The Archangel
So I have to wonder...if people do not update the app and continue to purchase through it, does Apple get the 30% cut?
I have no problem with the concept of Apple getting a portion of the profits if something is purchased through the app but I don't think they should get all of the profits.
Kirstenn said:Personally, I feel Apple is turning into Microsoft more and more each time something like this happens. Like Microsoft, they are taking away our freedom to choose what we do with a product we have purchased. When I purchased my iPad I did so because of the choices that were available to me. Take away those choices and I will find a product that will allow me to make those choices when it comes time to upgrade my iPad. As a society we have become complacent in allowing the corporations to make our choices for us believing that in order to use their products we must abide by their rules. However, as a consumer WE should be dictating what those rules are, not the other way around. Yes, I understand it is "just" a shortcut link to the store, but it is a link I utilized so why should I be forced to give it up on a product I have paid for and supported. This is blatant monopolization of consumer after product sales. Yes, they need to make money etc. But they have already reeped the benefits of my hard earned cash through the purchase of the iPad itself. If they want to continue to reep those benefits then they need to provide their CUSTOMERS with products/applications they do want to purchase instead of forcing them on us in such an underhanded manner. If you create a product we like Apple, we will purchase it, but do not insult the intelligence of your costomers by creating situations that force us to use something that is not our choice. iBooks is not my choice of applications for many of the reasons mentioned in other posts. Kindle provided a product that better met my needs so I went to their app instead. This is MY choice to utilize their application to download books to MY iPad. It is not a choice anyone should be making for me. I am the consumer, make me happy! Don't dictate to me what that happiness should look like, it is not your decision to make Apple!!!!
...I started reading this app hoping to answer a question that I will ask anyway. After doing the upgrade, could I revert back to the previous app's version by deleting the app from the iPad, then syncing to iTunes and have the app in iTunes reinstall? (Note, iTunes hasn't been in contact with the web because that computer has been powered off for a while). And if so, could I get my books back from a restore (of my backups) through iTunes?
Thanks.