Well you're right about one thing. This issue is not about unions. But then you're the one who injected them into the conversation right? As for your view of them your obvious bias explains all that need be said.I have dealt with unions all my life. From a once proud function, they are becoming a dinosaur. A few unions are changing their role in manufacturing, but most are not. It is that reason that they are under attack and becoming less relevant. It is no longer an effective tactic to strike every time a demand is wanted, because companies will finally get tired of it and relocate. This subject is not with unions, even though they play a part in why companies relocate to China and other countries. One of the big issues that manufacturers have with unions is the inflexibility of contracts. If a company needs to transfer 200 workers from assembling one product to another, or change their job descriptions, they should not have to wait on a union's permission.
And, my knowledge of China is fairly decent for a westerner. In case you are interested, I have lived and worked in Asia. I even speak a little Korean. Can you say the same? I make no claim of intimate understanding of their psyche, but I can follow their rationale. The Chinese put little value on life compared to the West. Slowly, by dealing with outside their borders, and from being able to get images of life in other countries, things will change. Just do not expect overnight changes. That becomes a cultural attack on their nation, and the leadership will resort to violence and suppression. It took China decades to recover from the cultural wars, and there is still much that has been lost to them forever.
I even speak a little Korean. Can you say the same?
The nets are ridiculous. Instead of doing the human thing and talking to their employees and trying to find out exactly why they might want to kill themselves, and then attempting to rectify that situation as much as possible, they take the coldly practical step of just trying to prevent them from doing it by jumping from their buildings.I don't want to get in the middle of this but I did notice that question when glancing through.
So yes, I can say the samething; because I am Korean
Now, to the point why I wanted to post something.. what do you guys think about Foxconn's Jumper Nets?
If you have no clue what that is, search and you'll find out. Pretty interesting what goes on there...
I have dealt with unions all my life. From a once proud function, they are becoming a dinosaur. A few unions are changing their role in manufacturing, but most are not. It is that reason that they are under attack and becoming less relevant. It is no longer an effective tactic to strike every time a demand is wanted, because companies will finally get tired of it and relocate. This subject is not with unions, even though they play a part in why companies relocate to China and other countries. One of the big issues that manufacturers have with unions is the inflexibility of contracts. If a company needs to transfer 200 workers from assembling one product to another, or change their job descriptions, they should not have to wait on a union's permission.
And, my knowledge of China is fairly decent for a westerner. In case you are interested, I have lived and worked in Asia. I even speak a little Korean. Can you say the same? I make no claim of intimate understanding of their psyche, but I can follow their rationale. The Chinese put little value on life compared to the West. Slowly, by dealing with outside their borders, and from being able to get images of life in other countries, things will change. Just do not expect overnight changes. That becomes a cultural attack on their nation, and the leadership will resort to violence and suppression. It took China decades to recover from the cultural wars, and there is still much that has been lost to them forever.
“This is the way capitalism is supposed to work,” said David Autor, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “As nations develop, wages rise and life theoretically gets better for everyone.
“But in China, for that change to be permanent, consumers have to be willing to bear the consequences. When people read about bad Chinese factories in the paper, they might have a moment of outrage. But then they go to Amazon and are as ruthless as ever about paying the lowest prices.”
An interesting article on Foxconn/labor in China that confirms much of what's been said here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/t...ange-at-chinas-electronics-giant-foxconn.html
One passage that seems especially germane to the discussion:
Yes, it seems workers usually end up paying the price.Something along the same lines that forced changes years ago:
Consumers flocked to Walmart for lower prices, so Target was forced to squeeze prices to be more competitive. One of the results was cuts in what used to be better benefits for workers. So some people ended up without insurance, for example.