DaveSt said:
I'll agree with you on the design and attention to detail. The fit and finish of my MacBook Pro is fantastic. Spec-wise however I would put it middle of the pack in general and probably lower than that when compared to a Windows machine of similar price. I'm not complaining though. The high quality of the device is what drew me to it in the first place and in that area it does not disappoint.
Actually you are Wytey are both right. What i meant in the context is that with a £500 budget one can get a decent windows laptop, where as the macbook starts at £999 which looks expensive. But the £500 laptop will not have 4 gig memory, nvidia graphics card, and for windows office (word, excel) one have to pay extra. By the time the windown computer is pimped to the the spec of the macbook the price is similar, but without yhe build quality or fit and finish. I have seen hp and samsung laptops on the £1000 range, and if the macbook did not exist i would highly recommed them, but not when the mac exists. Right now even the basic macbook and imac have I5 processors and amd graphics card
Sent from my iPad using iPF, using iOS 4.3.2
Couldn't agree more about the quality and bang for the buck. Exactly.
We've all had to deal with the "specs people" as I like to call them. I was one of them for years and years. Getting past that was one thing that took me a long time when comparing Macs and Windows based PC's. It's really not, and forgive the pun, apples to apples. Being a bit of a "gear head" I was always of the mind that more is better, that faster is best and the resulting "greater horsepower" was always superior. Turns out it really depends on what you're doing. I know my iMac can run circles around my much higher spec'd Windows machine when it comes to video and/or photo editing. Can it run a bazillion decimal quadra-formula Excel program as well? I have no idea...nor does it really matter to me.
As suggested, I'm not an Excel or Word "power user". I write business papers and magazine articles with Pages and run basic spreadsheets with Numbers...I can save them as Word or Excel documents if I need to give them to someone with MS Office. I also use MS Office for Mac sometimes. For my money Keynote blows PowerPoint out of the water, but I use PowerPoint regularly too. I love iMovie but use Final Cut Express when I want to get serious. Aperture is a terrific program but I also use Photoshop. All of those programs and more run spectacularly well on my Macs. I'm not a big gamer, but WOW does quite well too.
When discussions about what you can get with a Mac Vs a Windows machine arises I used to be the one poo-pooing Macs for their "weak" specs. "Heck, I can get twice the machine for half the price!" I used to say (think). The fact is that Macs are built from the ground up - including hardware
and software - by one team of people all working together to make the best of the best...to absolutely ensure that everything works seamlessly. There are very few Macs to choose from and that makes it even easier to control the quality...which IMHO no one can come close to.
Software is another great example of why Macs "just work". There is basically one iteration of the OS and the differential between models is very limited. As a developer it is dead simple to program for a Mac as compared to the multitude of "what if's" one has to deal with in a Windows world. Every single program offered in the Mac App store is tested from top to bottom by Apple to be certain that it will work before it's added. Once in a while there are issues, and we've all seen programs pulled so it's not a perfect world, but no one at MS or Dell or any other company does that AFAIK.
So I liken Windows Vs Mac kinds of comparisons to the difference between a 550HP Ford (which I can still drool over) and 350HP Lexus (which I can always depend on and the QC is second to none). They both can get you from A to B...decide which one makes more sense and really which one you would rather drive every day. As soon as I overcame my need to focus on the specs and really focus on what's important, to understand exactly what I was actually getting for my money and how well it worked, it became very clear who the "winner" was.
All great input everyone! Thanks!