Tongue twisters
- Thread starter Richard Brown
- Start date
I'm loving these tongue twisters.
Everyone thinks I've lost my marbles as I mutter along!
Sent from my iPad 1 using iPF - Greetings
Wow . . . those are not very good tongue twisters.
Three Swedish switched witches watch three Swiss Swatch watches switches. Which Swedish switched witch watch which Swiss Swatch watch witch?"
Shep Schwab shopped at Scott's Schnapps shop; One shot of Scott's Schnapps stopped Schwab's watch.
Which witch twisty witches' toung twisty twister which twister twist is that ratta tat tatty tat? Say that really fast, I double dog dare you, darn diddly dang.
Yiddish:
"Fir Funr Forn Firn Korn, Barg Arup un Barg Arip."
Any Yourba speakers?"Mo ra dodo n'ido, mo je dodo n'Ido. Mo wa f'owo dodo p'a mo ni dodo n'idodo n'ido."
Katranese perhaps?
"Bankapurada kempu kunkuma, bankapurada kempu kunkuma, bankapurada kempu kunkuma."
UPDATE: I propose the first annual IPA iPad Twister contest. Write an iPad related TT and I'll probably never send you some cool gifts. Like toungue splints and a purpose in life.
"Fir Funr Forn Firn Korn, Barg Arup un Barg Arip."
Any Yourba speakers?"Mo ra dodo n'ido, mo je dodo n'Ido. Mo wa f'owo dodo p'a mo ni dodo n'idodo n'ido."
Katranese perhaps?
"Bankapurada kempu kunkuma, bankapurada kempu kunkuma, bankapurada kempu kunkuma."
UPDATE: I propose the first annual IPA iPad Twister contest. Write an iPad related TT and I'll probably never send you some cool gifts. Like toungue splints and a purpose in life.
Translation?
Copyright Explained
When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?
Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write.
Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright.
Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right?
Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right. Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right?
Wrongfully copying a right writ, a right rite or copy is not right.
Copyright 1991 Shelley Herman S.P.E.B.S.Q.S.A., Whittier Chapter.
Adapted and Appended by Scott Simmerman. If you wish to copy or write
this as copy, please be certain to copy right the copyright -- contributed to
Swenny's E-Mail Funnies by Carter Olson, St. Paul, MN
When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?
Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write.
Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright.
Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right?
Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right. Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right?
Wrongfully copying a right writ, a right rite or copy is not right.
Copyright 1991 Shelley Herman S.P.E.B.S.Q.S.A., Whittier Chapter.
Adapted and Appended by Scott Simmerman. If you wish to copy or write
this as copy, please be certain to copy right the copyright -- contributed to
Swenny's E-Mail Funnies by Carter Olson, St. Paul, MN
Sensitive Selektionssimulatoren sondieren sogar sekundär-strukturierte Sonarselektoren - sogar sekundär-strukturierte Sonarselektoren sondieren sensitive Selektionssimulatoren.
(Too difficult to translate)
o is spoken like in "from", ie like ee, ä as in "when", u as in "woohoo"
(Too difficult to translate)
o is spoken like in "from", ie like ee, ä as in "when", u as in "woohoo"
Last edited:
Sorry, I am not from Yourba. I am not Yiddish and what the heck is a Katranesian, anyway? I think the second one has something to do with kittens and corsets. not sure, sorry. Ask Mr. Bing, he knows all.
Sensitive Selektionssimulatoren sondieren sogar sekundär-strukturierte Sonarselektoren - sogar sekundär-strukturierte Sonarselektoren sondieren sensitive Selektionssimulatoren.
(Too difficult to translate)
o is spoken like in "from", ie like ee, ä as in "when", u as in "woohoo"
LOL . . . you devil, you. I think you just offended 3% of the gathered group. Tisk, Tisk, Tisk!
I prefer Mr. Google.
