What's new

The "Anything Goes" thread

According to this BBC report - the jets may not have had sufficient fuel to push further out to sea
and maintain a margin of safety.

AA

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23394233

Sent from my iPhone using iPF

I had a look at the news reports here....they did say they were low on fuel and didn't want to land with a payload.

I guess it will give divers something to look for now. Just not what should be there though. :(
 
I had a look at the news reports here....they did say they were low on fuel and didn't want to land with a payload.

I guess it will give divers something to look for now. Just not what should be there though. :(

This could be material for 'Sharknado 2'!

A ginormous waterspout forms over the reef at the same time one of the bombs spontaneously detonates. The over pressure ejects thousands of sharks into the vortex. The spout then moves inland spitting out the toothy monsters on unsuspecting Aussie citizens!

Oh! And Mad Max comes out of retirement to save the day.


Never gets tired. :)

AA

Sent from my iPhone using iPF
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This could be material for 'Sharknado 2'!

A ginormous waterspout forms over the reef at the same time one of the bombs spontaneously detonates. The over pressure ejects thousands of sharks into the vortex. The spout then moves inland spitting out the toothy monsters on unsuspecting Aussie citizens!

Oh! And Mad Max comes out of retirement to save the day.

YouTube Link: http://youtu.be/gP-AbRTYNhI

Never gets tired. :)

AA

Sent from my iPhone using iPF

Lol! What a riot that would be! ;)
 
Lol! What a riot that would be! ;)

There was apparently no environmental impact but why they would have a bombing range on one of those subtropical islands is beyond me, given Oz empty spaces elsewhere.
Loved that video film extract AA. Reminded me of the local hoons a few blocks away doing burnouts last Saturday night;)
Andrew


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
According to this BBC report - the jets may not have had sufficient fuel to push further out to sea
and maintain a margin of safety.

AA

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23394233

Sent from my iPhone using iPF

The US forces seem to have missed a trick here. If the bombs are safe, why doesn't the navy retrieve them? That could be a training exercise which shows responsibility.

Sent from my iPad using iPF
 
It's a boy.

4:24pm London local time.

Name pending.

It is almost certain John, Paul, George and Ringo are out of the question.

Mick, Keith, Ron and Charlie are long shots. ;)

AA

Sent from my iPhone using iPF
 
It's a boy.

4:24pm London local time.

Name pending.

It is almost certain John, Paul, George and Ringo are out of the question.

Mick, Keith, Ron and Charlie are long shots. ;)

AA

Sent from my iPhone using iPF

Congratulations.

Just don't alliterate the tyke's name. At least not all three of them. I 'narrowly' escaped this fate. ;)
 
It's a boy.

4:24pm London local time.

Name pending.

It is almost certain John, Paul, George and Ringo are out of the question.

Mick, Keith, Ron and Charlie are long shots. ;)

AA

Sent from my iPhone using iPF

Woohoo!

Lol.....whatever it is, it will most likely be a few well used names from the past!
 
Woohoo!

Lol.....whatever it is, it will most likely be a few well used names from the past!

Names of all the British monarchs from the past are eligible. Maybe Aethelred known as Aethelred the Unready (978 - 1013) son of Edgar the Peaceful? Well, maybe not;)
Andrew


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Names of all the British monarchs from the past are eligible. Maybe Aethelred known as Aethelred the Unready (978 - 1013) son of Edgar the Peaceful? Well, maybe not;) Andrew Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not quite. There has never been another King John after the one that signed the Magna Carta.
 

Most reactions

Latest posts

Back
Top