Exactly, the mods could review or ask specific members to review to gain some control, the responses to those reviews would allow all in the forum to contribute.
The idea is a good one, because we can then establish a certain standard and quality for reviews, which in turn leads to increased (and repeat) readership, which in turn attracts more sponsors/advertisers/other freebies to get to review. This also raises questions of "how do you determine editorial standards" and "who's going to actually do it" which is a long-term issue, once you get past the initial excitement of getting it started.
I guess my specific views about review-writing comes from having been both a (music) reviewer and an editor since 1998 (including professional freelancing writing gigs for magazines and websites.) A good reviewer needs:
1. a good command of the language. Being able to write with style and flair counts for a lot.
2. product knowledge. Many reviewers enthusiastically praise one product (just the one they bought and own) - but if you haven't actually seen or used other products, how do you know how your product stands in comparison to others?
(Reviewing can be an expensive hobby, I should add. Although I also received tons of CDs free between 1998 and 2006 because the music labels were practically throwing product at us.)
As I said, reviews are easy to write - but producing an
informed review is actually a highly acquired skill, and mentoring inexperienced writers is an important aspect of a good editor.
If the owners of the forum want to go down this path, I'd be happy to help out to get things rolling - just unsure at this point how much I can commit in the long-term because of family time and other demands.