Superbike81 said:Everyone seems so against Flash and so for HTML5, but the most recent tests with the newest version of Flash, show on pretty much everything except Apple products, Flash 10.1 is actually significantly more efficient than HTML5.
Why is everyone loving HTML5 so much when Flash is more efficient, more widespread, and from the sites that I've seen from different "best of HTML5" websites Flash is much prettier and has more cool features.
The difference between flash and HTML 5 is that for flash, there is only one provider. With HTML 5 , is it a standard that any provider can use. To develop web site in flash, you need to use adobe products, that's not the case for HTML 5. But the worse part is that to view such site in flash, you have to use adobe product, not the case for HTML 5.
It almost the same thing as saying that if you want to drive on some roads, you have to use a Toyota car, and nothing else... So you have two choices, buy a Toyota or avoid these roads.
It's not that flash is bad (or evil as some fanboys like to say), it is a matter of being free to access the information as I see it. Think about that debate about the document formats. There is a war actually for portability of word processing documents between several formats. That came because everything was only compatible with MS Word and had to use Microsoft products only.
We are now facing the same issue with web content. That is what HTML 5 is trying to solve. A common format that everybody can use.
You do understand that with HTML 5 different companies support different video technologies right? Google, Mozilla and Opera support one while Apple and Microsoft support another. So that is going to fragment the hell out of the web unless one standard is accepted. HTML5 is not the holy grail, even though Apple has been trying to sell it to you as such as an explanation why they don't have basic web functionality such as flash included in their devices.